Advertisement

Customize
About this Journal
Current Month
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930
Nov. 15th, 2009 @ 10:29 am Journey to the Centre of the Earth
Tags: ,
Indeed, the rest of the film could probably best be described as very mediocre. You wouldn't have thought a film could be very mediocre. It should be either good or bad. But that's the best description.

The film isn't boring, or more implausible that normal (and gets a big pass because, well, it's got to be based on Journey to the Centre of the Earth). But nothing much happens. No plot, no interesting characters, no tension. Dinosaurs, yes, but no tension.

You can also comment at http://jack.dreamwidth.org/601503.html using OpenID. comment count unavailable comments so far.
About this Entry
Nov. 12th, 2009 @ 03:24 pm Harry Potter Dark Arts Teachers
Spoilers for Harry Potter books I-VII )

You can also comment at http://jack.dreamwidth.org/600616.html using OpenID. comment count unavailable comments so far.
About this Entry
Oct. 20th, 2009 @ 03:13 pm Recent freeware platform games, An Untitled Story and Eversion
Tags: ,
I recently played two games linked from http://www.toothycat.net/wiki/wiki.pl?FreeGames which I really liked.

"AN UNTITLED STORY" platform adventure from Matt Makes Games

An Untitled Story is the sort of platformer I really like. You start off just exploring and it slowly gets harder and harder and you collect extra life and extra abilities (but in a deterministic fashion, unlike computer-roleplaying-games). You start off as a formless egg, able to jump slightly and that's it, and end up with more than 500 life and 50 unique abilities.

The graphics are really simple, but elegant: like a small child would draw, if it were then made really really good.

Toward the end it gets really hard. And there are specific save points, so you have to get used to going away and coming back calm to do the difficult bits, especially when there's no save point DIRECTLY BEFORE A BOSS.

Links:
Review and description: http://www.gamemakergames.com/?a=view&id=6278
Home page: http://mattmakesgames.com/games.php
Walkthrough: http://helixc.dabomstew.com/index.php?action=printpage;topic=4727.0

Alas, I got nearly to the end and found a bit sufficiently difficult I didn't continue. Now I just want to get it out of my head.

Eversion

See Alex's review of this (and some others) here: http://alextfish.livejournal.com/8791.html

It's quite short, but fun while it lasts. It starts off as a happy shiny grass-trees-sun cutesy platformer, and then gets lovecraftian, and the hell-like levels are really, really, really creepy. The interface is interesting: you flip between different modes during the level, which affects where you can get to.

You can also comment at http://jack.dreamwidth.org/597874.html using OpenID. comment count unavailable comments so far.
About this Entry
Sep. 7th, 2009 @ 08:22 pm Fantasy epics rated on how much they rip off Tolkien
Tags: ,
There are several supposedly high fantasy epics series that I remembered as vaguely Tolkien-esque, but always used to get muddled and forever put off reading because I

couldn't remember which ones were supposed to be any good. Now I've a fair idea, and will now rate them on how much they rip off Tolkien.

In no particular order:

(1) George Martin: "Song of Ice and Fire: Game of Thrones" 3/10. I recently read the first two of these after really loving his Stories/Novels Armageddon Rag, Aces Wild, and Hedge Knight. (He also wrote Windhaven and the Havilan Tuff series.) I thought they were really good, and like Tolkien only in being (a) good (b) epic world changing events (c) the list of twenty previous kings being relevant to the country (d) long (e) having "R R" as his middle initials. However, it is (α) not a quest novel (β) doesn't have an implacable opaque Force of Evil as the antagonist (γ) has actual characters who make decisions based on actual emotions.

(2) David Eddings. "Belgariad: Pawn of Prophecy" 7/10. I've not read these, so I'm kind of guessing at the score. However, I have the impression (which may or may not be correct) that they're coming-of-age quest narratives which are endlessly recycled into each book, and a good introduction to fantasy, but not worth it if you've read a lot of fantasy before.

(3) Terry Brooks. "Sword of Shannara". 8/10. Elves. Magic swords. Despoiled home village of protagonist. Blah-de-blah-de-blah. I've not read it, but at least one person when I said "You know, that book that's ACTUALLY a Tolkien rip-off" said, "oh, you mean Brooks?"

(4) Raymond E. Feist. "Magician". 10/10. Dude, this is only saved from scoring 11 because you very sensibly, after ripping off half of it from Tolkien, ripped the other half off the less-well-known The empire of the petal throne. (And seriously, what exactly is NOT less well known than Tolkien? Harry Potter?) I thought the other half was quite original, until I discovered, on wikipedia, it was also ripped off. That doesn't mean the book is bad, some friends definitely enjoyed it (and I still have a mild curiousity to know what happened in-story to cause these universes to bud). But seriously, if you name your ripped off elvish races in Sindarin that is not subtle.

(5) David Gemmel. ?/10. Don't know anything but the name.

(6) Robert Jordan. (2/10) Endless endless endless endless series with more and more and more and more and more characters who whine and whine and whine about gender relations. About half is quite good. The first bit is a Tolkien-rip off, but quite well done, and most of the rest's flaws are not that.

(7) Stephen R. Donaldson. The Chronicles of Thomas Covenant. (0/10) As far as I can tell, these don't have anything to do with Tolkien at all, they're just not any good. Based on the first thirty pages of the first one, I will over-generalise the experience into "ten books of Thomas Covenant whining about having leprosy, or not having leprosy, or no-one liking him". I can be depressed on my own, thanks. I didn't find reading this added measurably to the experience. The other duology Mordant's Need has some interesting ideas, but suffers similarly from whining. His short stories are very good, you should read those. They are a bit grim read back-to-back, but many are very good individually.

And now, I'll include a very brief reminder for a variety of other fantasy series which mostly don't rip off Tolkien appreciably more than any other member of the fantasy genre, but at one time or another I had trouble remembering which they were. (This is not a very hard criterion, and excludes many notably good and bad books. Eg. whether you like Asimov or not, most people know he's "the one with the prolific 60s sci-fi" or "the one with the robots and pschohistory" without me telling you.)

Read more... )

You can also comment at http://jack.dreamwidth.org/594337.html using OpenID. comment count unavailable comments so far.
About this Entry
Aug. 12th, 2009 @ 02:24 pm Back from America
Tags: ,
I'm back home from America. I had a marvellous time. Darcy and Gisella, and Anna, and Jen are really lovely, and Berkeley/San Francisco and New York are great.

I'd been warned that America was not as used to vegetarians as England, and indeed, if I'd been there with non-vegetarian friends it might indeed have been awkward, but most of the bits I saw looked like a big boat full of beautiful helpful people had crashed into a big boat full of good vegetarian restaurants, and where they washed ashore someone said "hey, let's build a city like this".

The California climate is really lovely. We were lucky with the New York Climate, because it was less boiling humid than it normally was, but it was still boiling humid.
About this Entry
Jul. 15th, 2009 @ 11:48 pm Armageddon Rag
When I started going out with Liv, we pressed on each other some of our favourite books, many of which became instant favourites. Unfortunately I absorbed so much new material so quickly, most of it never got blogged about at the time.

It's notoriously hard to describe why Armageddon Rag is so good. I generally say something like "You know how many books attempt to cash in on the vague connection between rock music and the supernatural, and describe music so evocative you can practically hear it and it makes your spine creep? And use that feeling to subtly suggest that, maybe, just this once, something supernatural is going on behind the scenes? And those books generally fall far short, because describing what music feels like with text is really hard and no-one can do it? Well, Armageddon Rag does do it. It makes you want to run out and buy the records, and be horribly stricken that they don't exist!"

The band are called the Nazgul, but it's not heavy on Tolkien rip-offs. They were massive in the 60s, until the lead singer was assassinated. The main character and others were mostly active in counter-culture then, writers for alternative magazines, etc, but are all grown up now, and looking back on who they used to be, and who they expected to be now. I really can't do it justice, but it jumped instantly into being one of my favourite books. (You may also want to read Liv's and Rysmiel's reviews, as Rysmiel originally introduced it to Liv.)
About this Entry
Jun. 25th, 2009 @ 08:15 am Anchor, Sutton gaul
The anchor, sutton gaul (?) is a really great restaurant.

It's a converted pub, and feels cosy, but also like being at a r not a pub.

It's plonked down in the middle of the fens; outside the view is lovely.

It costs about 10GBP for a vegetarian main course and the food was really delicous. I'd definitely like to go back.
About this Entry
Jun. 6th, 2009 @ 02:28 pm Order of the Stick
Today I think I applauded a webcomic for the first time. The last arc in Order of the Stick really has been amazing.
About this Entry
May. 25th, 2009 @ 01:14 pm Startrek 2009
Tags: ,
Overall impressions

It reminded me a lot of movies adapting comic books. It was extremely enjoyable, funny, awesome and exciting. The characters and some of the scenes were extremely memorable. However, as a whole it was not really memorable. The classic Startrek films, even the bad ones, you know what they were about, but here despite [spoiler], it felt very vapoury, and I never cared what was going to happen, so it might as well have been a clip show of cool moments.

Now when I watch individual episodes of Startrek I don't find them very interesting, but on the other hand, the premises and characters I find almost infinitely memorable. There seems to be an incredibly strong framework, built up out of many throw-away comments in many episodes, that makes even the minor characters tower like legends. It may not make sense, but I really care that Sulu became a captain.

A film showing younger versions of the characters, and being made 40 years later, is inevitably a reimagining of them, however I thought they did this just about perfectly (again, like a comic book movie, where they take the basic premise and adapt it, rather than writing a strict adaption or sequel to the comics). They abstract all the most cool features of the characters, and give them more depth, bringing them to life even more so, in a way that wouldn't work if they hadn't been so legendary to start with.

They weren't afraid to change things (eg. what we know about these characters at the academy, history of vulcans and romulans) some of which was justified in-story and some wasn't. However, it all felt true to the spirit of the show, so I accepted it, whether or not a pedant (or someone with common sense) would think it was wrong.

Spoilers )
About this Entry
May. 7th, 2009 @ 03:23 pm Mistborn: The Final Empire
Tags: ,
Book: Mistborn: the Final Empire
Where from: Fivemack lent it to me in the Carlton -- thank you! It's great being lent books spontaneously.
Author: Brian Brandon Sanderson
Hold on, which wheel of time novel did he write? The last one.
What's it about: Firstly, a the author himself says, "a gang of gentlemen thieves who each had a distinctive magic power"
And secondly? A detailed magic system.
And thirdly? A rebellion against an evil emperor, who was once a great hero who saved the world (or nearly so, it's still in ruins).
What's really good: It's a medley of interesting ideas. The characters are memorable, the setting is creepy, and most of all, a lot of pay-off is mostly in discovering how the different sorts of magic and magical creatures work and interact, which is something I really love.
What's not: Unfortunately, despite many good aspects, it reads a little bit as if someone had pulled out a bunch of good tropes (some old, some new) and stuck them together. But it meant I didn't have much emotional engagement. Deaths made me think "yep, fantasy trope #517 fulfilled", and fight scenes "ooh, that's a good info-dump of how allomatic powers work". But not be engaged. I definitely wanted to find out what happened, but didn't really care about the middle.
Do you want to read the sequels: Yes, at least to find out what happens next.
About this Entry
May. 4th, 2009 @ 08:36 pm X-men Origins: Wolverine
X-Men Origins, despite having a slightly unwieldy title, is pretty good. I don't think it's as memorable as the other films, but if you like that sort of thing, it's definitely well worth watching.

I feared they'd have a two-hour fest of wolverine being wolverine, which doesn't hold up without anyone to play him off against, but no. They show the process of Wolverine becoming Wolverine, and have a cast of good characters (at least one of whom was really awesome), which is emotionally non-pointless. It's also not just Wolverine, it's important to the X-men films too.

It's funny, and the action is fairly good, although not as awesome as the other films.

In fact, it's one of the few prequels I'm curious to know how someone would react watching them in internal chronological order. I'm not recommending it, but I thought it interesting. It would be interesting to watch the other films, knowing Wolverine and the colonel are. You'd have less excitement discovering Wolverine's history in this film, but then, I never thought it really mattered, Wolverine was defined much more by his ambiguous history that by what it actually was. You'd have more excitement wondering if/how that history was going to affect the present.

Nitpicks )
About this Entry
Apr. 20th, 2009 @ 01:22 pm Continued reviews of films based solely on the trailer
Tags: ,
Two more trailers left a lingering residue of sarcasm to be worked out of my system.

Knowing, Nicolas Cage

"Buried in a time capsule for give decades. These numbers predicted every global disaster for the past fifty years..."

The premise of the film is that Nicolas Cage finds a bunch of mysterious numbers a young girl left in a school's time capsule and discovers these numbers predict global disasters. It turns out that people are equally resistant to averting disasters they're told about from a wild-eyed numerologist, as they are to averting disasters they're told about from the newspapers every morning.

"What happens when the numbers run out?"

Uhhh... maybe people will stop dying tragically, and everyone will be happy? With bunnies?

NB: I hear the film itself may be quite good. I don't know. I was just feeling very, very sarcastic when I saw the trailer.

"wakes up in adult body..."

I tried to avoid the "17 again" posters, just in case looking at them would permanently impair my intelligence. Unfortunately, it seems that my subconscious invented an entirely different film, loosely inspired by them, about a teenager who wakes up in the body of an adult. Probably starring Adam Sandler.

It took me a little while to work out if this was a different film, or if I had completely imagined it, but it seems I did! (Unless anyone knows different.) However, I had worked up such a head of sarcasm about it that I had to let it out anyway.

I would say something like, a biting response would be to say that Adam Sandler is a teenager who's woken up in the body of an adult. A very biting response would be to say that a teenager is a teenager who's woken up in the body of an adult.

A teenage mind in an adult body is classic premise of much superb literature. The difference is that when Shakespeare did it, he did it because he was a keen observer of human nature, whereas Sandler had to invent some sort of magical macguffin in order to make a film about vomiting into beer glasses[1].

[1] To be fair, Shakespeare also made plays designed to be popular. But as I say, I was being sarcastic, not fair :)
About this Entry
Apr. 8th, 2009 @ 08:55 pm Recently released films
Tags: ,
Stupidest title and tagline

The Unborn. "It wants to be born"

Content warning so stupid its actually physically painful:

The runner up was "Contains one use of strong language and moderate sex references", which was originally going to win the "stupidest content warning" category, on account of making me laugh out loud. That was a British content warning. Then I read an American content warning.

"Rated R for frenetic strong bloody violence throughout, crude and graphic sexual content, nudity and pervasive language.

OK, so being specific in warnings could be a helpful concept, but it just sounds, you know, really stupid. I actually assumed the second was a pardoy, and that IMDB had become completely open content, and went off to find a citation (MPAA).

Apparently those are ACTUAL categories. "Frenetic strong bloody violence throughout, crude and graphic sexual content, nudity and pervasive language" excluding bloody violence, sounds like my love live. The point being, to me, pervasive language sounds like a good thing. Have these people ever, you know, read a book? Or seen a play? Or listened to the radio? Those are nothing BUT language. I can understand that people under the age of 18 might conceivably want to avoid a film where the language is not carefully confined to small self-contained segmants, but I don't see any point in legally requiring them to!

Premise so stupid it's actually physically painful:

Crank: High Voltage.

"The first ‘Crank’ movie, saw Jason Statham poisoned then forced to keep his adrenalin up to stay alive, This time, Chev is in a spot of bother with a Chinese gangster, who has removed his heart and has replaced with a mechanical one that needs to be jolted with an electric charge to stay pumping."

Crank: High Voltage also received honourable mention in the "stupidest title" category. Come to think of it, I think that was the film the "content warning so stupid it's physically painful" came from too. Not that that means it has to be a bad film.
About this Entry
Apr. 8th, 2009 @ 06:06 pm Extremely condensed reviews: Daughter of Regals, Dzur, and Our Man in Camelot
Daughter of Regals and Other Tales (Stephen Donaldson)

I have the same comments as of Reave the Just and Other Tales, namely that I much, much prefer his short stories to his novels, because they all have very interesting ideas, however I find it very draining that they're all about nasty people, nasty situations, and depression.

Roll on disfiguring diseases, people wallowing in self-hate, people cavorting in casual mistreatment of others, destruction of beautiful creatures and last shreds of hope, etc, etc. Obviously great literature is stereotypically associated with black despair, but I get a certain "unhealthy obsession" vibe.

Dzur (Stephen Brust)

I have the same comments as of the last few Vlad Taltos novels. It was fascinating for what it revealed about the overall story of the series, but I didn't really find the novel itself as engaging as some of the others.

Our Man in Camelot

I have the same comment as I really loved all the previous Anthony Price novels, even though friends have warned me that the couple immediately preceding this weren't necessarily up to snuff, but although it followed in the general practice of Price novels, and was fairly interesting in the characters and history, I didn't really engage with it as much as the others.

Major spoilers for Our Man in Camelot and War Games )
About this Entry
Mar. 22nd, 2009 @ 03:45 pm (no subject)
Tags: ,
The Shivah

Did you ever play Monkey Island and say "Wow, that was the coolest graphic adventure game ever. The only way it could possibly be more cool is if you replaced pirates with Rabbis?" If so:

Wadjet Eye Games: The Shivah

Blocks with letters on

Did you ever say "Wow, that was a good game title, but I feel it wasn't quite the best at capturing the experience of the game"? "Blocks With Letters On" is probably not the most explanatory title ever, that probably goes to "Shoot everything that moves[1]". But it's pretty good:

http://www.kongregate.com/games/Morpheme/blocks-with-letters-on

[1] Actual game title
About this Entry
Mar. 19th, 2009 @ 08:45 pm American Born Chinese graphic novel
Author: Gene Luen Yang

Summary: A graphic novel about the Monkey King, a young first-generation Chinese-American boy, and an all American boy with an annoying Chinese cousin.

Lent by: CGM ([info]ravingglory)

As CGM commented, it can be very quick to read a graphic novel, as compared to a written novel, but as you know that already, I tried not to let it influence the review.

It's a very nice book. It's pleasant, has a great dry wit, and makes you really feel for Jin and the other characters. I love its depictions of the Monkey King, accurate (as far as I remember) but lovingly witty. It was apparently quite well known, though I hadn't heard of it. In fact, I don't have very much to say, other than "I've not read a lot of books like this, but it was very good, so if CGM offers it to you, say yes".

The only other comment is on something that ISN'T there. There were two or three potential points of controversy. The Monkey King story is told from a Christian perspective. Danny's Chinese cousin, Chin-Kee is a personification of all the worst stereotypes about Chinese people, and similarly, young Jin is torn between having an identity of his own, and fitting into the culture he lives in and enjoys. But all are written so naturally, by Yang himself a Chinese-Christian-American, that all the reviews say "And I see why somebody MIGHT be offended, but in fact, it seems to turn out that no-one IS".

A panel from the comic: http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_69IBT9GTSiI/SNzVxbDGXOI/AAAAAAAAAPA/nNLtLLnrsAE/s400/chinese.panel.jpg
A description by the author: http://www.firstsecondbooks.com/authors/geneYangBlogMain.html
A review, mentioning the controvertial aspects: http://www.readaboutcomics.com/2006/08/28/american-born-chinese/
About this Entry
Mar. 15th, 2009 @ 02:42 pm Further observations on Watchmen
Tags: ,
Spoilers )
About this Entry
Mar. 10th, 2009 @ 03:45 pm Enoch Root PS.
Spoilers )
About this Entry
Mar. 10th, 2009 @ 03:02 pm What IS up with Enoch Root?
Spoilers for Cryptonomicon, The Baroque Cycle, and Anathem )
About this Entry
Mar. 10th, 2009 @ 01:56 am (no subject)
I recently read a novel describing an invasion of Great Britain in Napoleonic time. Though London was occupied, fortunately the government and armed forces were able to retreat to Scotland. However, the south suffered much despoilation, guerilla fighting, collaboration, massacres, starvation, etc, much as all the other countries in Europe had.

Obviously there are many examples of countries that suffered like that at the time, and that suffer like that now. Some endlessly war-torn. Some without any hope of reclaiming the country, and with refugees scattered to countries not their own to live as best they can. Sometimes integrated, sometimes not integrated for hundreds or thousands of years. (I deliberately said Great Britain rather than United Kingdom at the start, as regardless of the situation now, I didn't feel comfortable describing a conquest of Ireland by a foreign power as fictional.)

And there are many fictional books about a noble rebellion overthrowing an evil dictator or conqueror. Although in most, you don't have any attachment to the country before, you just want things to get better than they are now. I know there ought to be examples, but I can't think of any books with the same vibe.

For though I'm not especially a British nationalist, what I wanted to say was that it felt different when it was this country, than in all those other examples.
About this Entry